Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume 111, Issue 1 , Pages 28-33, January 2009

The pressure angle of the median nerve as a new magnetic resonance imaging parameter for the evaluation of carpal tunnel

  • Göksel Somay

      Affiliations

    • Haydarpasa Numune Research Hospital, First Neurology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Ressam Şevket sok. Dorman apt. No:5 D:6, Şenesenevler, 34744 Kadıköy-Istanbul, Turkey. Tel.: +90 216 414 45 02; fax: +90 216 384 77 48.
  • ,
  • Hakan Somay

      Affiliations

    • Haydarpasa Numune Research Hospital, Neurosurgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Deniz Çevik

      Affiliations

    • Haydarpasa Numune Research Hospital, First Neurology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Faik Sungur

      Affiliations

    • Haydarpasa Numune Research Hospital, Radiology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Zafer Berkman

      Affiliations

    • Haydarpasa Numune Research Hospital, Neurosurgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey

Received 28 November 2007; received in revised form 2 July 2008; accepted 5 July 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the MRI findings of the wrists of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and controls. We present a new MRI parameter, the pressure angle of the median nerve, in CTS patients.

Patients and methods

The study included 55 wrists, 36 of which were diagnosed with CTS and 19 healthy controls. All subjects underwent clinical, electrophysiological, and MRI evaluation. Clinical and electrophysiological findings were staged according to the degree of deficit. MRI parameters including median nerve diameter (MR1) and width (MR2) at the pisiform bone level; median nerve diameter (MR3) and width (MR4) at the hamate bone level; carpal arch width (MR5); carpal arch height (MR6); pressure angle of the median nerve (MR7); carpal tunnel diameter at the pisiform bone level (MR8); carpal tunnel diameter at the hamate bone level (MR9) and median nerve-flattening ratio were investigated. Eighteen operated wrists were evaluated 8 weeks after surgery. Correlation between the MRI parameters, EMG and clinical signs were evaluated.

Results

Among the 36 wrists with CTS, 5.6% were mild cases, 55.6% were moderate, and 38.9% were severe. Electromyography staging was as follows: 5.6% mild, 52.8% moderate, and 41.7% severe. A good correlation between the clinical and electrophysiological staging of the wrists with CTS was demonstrated (P=0.0001). Median nerve width and carpal tunnel diameter at the pisiform bone level were found to be significantly increased whereas median nerve diameter at the hamate bone level and pressure angle of the median nerve (PAMN) were significantly lower in CTS group in comparison to controls. After surgery, median nerve diameter and width at the pisiform bone level decreased whereas median nerve diameter at the hamate bone level increased. In addition, carpal arch height and PAMN were also found to be significantly increased (P=0.0001). The carpal tunnel diameter and median nerve-flattening ratio increased at the hamate bone level post-operatively (P=0.0001) with no change at the pisiform bone level.

Conclusion

The pressure angle of the median nerve may prove useful in the assessment of idiopathic CTS, both before and after surgery.

Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Median nerve, Magnetic resonance imaging, Electrophysiology, Electromyography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0303-8467(08)00283-7

doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.07.008

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume 111, Issue 1 , Pages 28-33, January 2009